C1June 5, 2026·2 min read·368 words·7 vocab words·Source: TechCrunch

Whistleblower Alleges IBM Orchestrated a Systematic Cover-Up of State-Sponsored Cyber Intrusions

Read at another level
A1A2B1B2C1
Whistleblower Alleges IBM Orchestrated a Systematic Cover-Up of State-Sponsored Cyber Intrusions
Photo: TechCrunch
Listen — hands-free audio modeSwipe through today's stories at your level. Lock your screen and keep listening.Survival phrases — real-world situationsBrowse graded phrases for travel, work, emergencies and more. Audio in 5 languages.
Vocabulary · Words with a dotted underline are vocabulary words — tap for an instant definition.

A former senior cybersecurity executive at IBM has alleged that the company orchestrated a systematic cover-up of multiple data breaches perpetrated by foreign state actors. William Barlow, who served as IBM's vice president of threat intelligence until his departure in August 2019, filed a lawsuit in 2020 that was unsealed this week. The complaint contends that Chinese hackers infiltrated IBM's core network between 2013 and 2016, yet the company neither disclosed the breaches to the public nor notified relevant government agencies. Barlow further asserts that at least two IBM subsidiaries were similarly compromised and that these incidents were also concealed. Trusteer, a cybersecurity startup acquired by IBM in 2013, was breached in 2018, while Truven, a healthcare data startup acquired in 2016, experienced multiple breaches post-acquisition. Barlow maintains that IBM failed to conduct proper investigations or disclosures for any of these breaches. IBM's spokesperson, Miki Carver, declined to address specific allegations, stating instead that the U.S. Department of Justice had declined to intervene and that IBM was confident it had adhered to the law. The hackers are linked to APT 10, a group associated with the Chinese government, whose members were indicted by the FBI in 2018. According to the complaint, the hackers infiltrated IBM's network and also accessed data maintained in collaboration with AT&T. In March 2017, intelligence officials from the Five Eyes alliance—comprising Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States—warned IBM of the intrusion, prompting an internal investigation. That investigation concluded that APT 10 had potentially breached IBM's network more than 56,000 times. Crucially, however, further forensic analysis was precluded because IBM had failed to retain logs of network access—a fundamental security protocol. The complaint also reveals that four servers were compromised and that nearly 400 accounts and almost 200 systems across every IBM business unit, spanning 18 countries, had been accessed. Jason Brown, Barlow's counsel, stated that his firm intends to litigate the matter aggressively. Brown posited that it is inherently contradictory for a company to market cybersecurity solutions to the federal government while harboring such vulnerabilities internally. This case underscores the persistent challenge of ensuring corporate particularly when data breach notification laws, though increasingly prevalent, may be circumvented.

Speak about it

Take a position. Out loud, if you can.

Four ways to start. Pick one and try saying it before you scroll on.

Tip · Record yourself, use in a notebook, or practice with a language partner.

Comprehension
Question 1 of 3

What does the complaint contend regarding IBM's actions?

Grammar spotlight

Complex Subordination with Concessive Clauses

One point · C1

We use concessive clauses with 'although', 'though', 'even though', or 'despite' to show contrast. Example: 'Although the breaches were discovered, IBM did not disclose them.'

From this article

A former senior cybersecurity executive at IBM has alleged that the company orchestrated a systematic cover-up of multiple data breaches perpetrated by foreign state actors.

What to know · C1

Use it today

Try saying this aloud

Neutral register

Scenario: Writing a formal analysis for a business journal

  1. 01The company has been accused of orchestrating a cover-up.
  2. 02It is contended that the breaches were never disclosed.
  3. 03The case underscores the challenge of ensuring corporate accountability.

Register tip · formal

🔑Key Phrases

orchestrated a systematic cover-upplanned and carried out a deliberate hiding of facts

This uses 'orchestrate' metaphorically, a C1-level verb for complex planning, and 'systematic' for methodical action.

metaphorical verb + adjective + noun

The administration orchestrated a systematic cover-up of the scandal.

neither disclosed the breaches to the public nor notified relevant government agenciesdid not reveal the incidents to the public and also did not inform the appropriate authorities

This uses 'neither...nor' for parallel negation, a sophisticated C1 structure for listing omissions.

correlative conjunction 'neither...nor'

The company neither apologized nor offered compensation.

further forensic analysis was precluded because IBM had failed to retain logsadditional technical investigation was prevented because IBM did not keep records

This passive construction with 'preclude' and 'had failed' (past perfect) shows cause and effect in formal register.

passive voice + past perfect

Further testing was precluded because the lab had failed to calibrate the equipment.

🎙️ Article Audio — Kokoro TTS

Whistleblower Alleges IBM Orchestrated a Systematic Cover-Up of State-Sponsored Cyber Intrusions

Adapted from TechCrunch · Read the original. LectoPress rewrites the facts as original graded-reader text for language learners.

Daily digest · Free

Get stories at your level, every day

C1 · EN · delivered to your inbox · unsubscribe any time

Customize language, level & topics → full preferences

Continue reading