A Mother Seeks Legal Advice After Ex-Husband Refuses to Hand Over Children's College Funds
A divorced mother is seeking legal help because her former husband refuses to give their daughters $20,000 each that was given by her mother for their college education. The money was given before their divorce without a formal written contract. Legal experts explain that while verbal agreements are hard to enforce, bank records or messages could prove the money belongs to the children. The mother is now collecting evidence to see if she can take her ex-husband to court.
A divorced mother has sought legal guidance after her abusive former spouse refused to release funds intended for their daughters' higher education. Prior to their separation, the woman's mother handed over a sum of $20,000 per child to the husband, expecting him to invest the money safely for the girls' future academic needs. However, now that the children are preparing for university, the father is refusing to turn over the accumulated capital.
According to the mother, the financial arrangement was based on verbal trust during the marriage rather than a formal written contract. Consequently, she is now questioning whether her ex-husband is legally obligated to transfer the cash. Legal experts note that verbal agreements regarding financial management can be notoriously difficult to enforce in court, especially when they occur between family members prior to a marital breakdown. Nevertheless, if evidence exists—such as bank transfer records, text messages, or email exchanges—a judge might recognize the funds as a constructive trust held specifically for the children.
Family law specialists suggest that if the money was explicitly gifted to the daughters rather than given to the husband as personal income, he may have violated his fiduciary duties by withholding it. If the mother had secured a written agreement during the divorce proceedings, enforcing the payout today would be significantly easier. Furthermore, if it can be proven that the father intentionally misappropriated the capital for personal gain, he could face formal legal action. For now, the mother is gathering financial records to determine whether a court challenge would be successful.
Take a position. Out loud, if you can.
Four ways to start. Pick one and try saying it before you scroll on.
Tip · Record yourself, use in a notebook, or practice with a language partner.
How much money was originally given to the husband for each daughter?
Third Conditional
The third conditional is used to talk about hypothetical situations in the past that did not happen.
“If the mother had secured a written agreement during the divorce proceedings, enforcing the payout today would be significantly easier.”
What to know · B2
Try saying this aloud
Scenario: Discussing financial disputes or legal advice with friends.
- 01“seek legal guidance”
- 02“legally obligated”
- 03“written agreement”
Register tip · informal
🔑Key Phrases
Useful for discussing formal or legal responsibilities regarding money.
The company is legally obligated to transfer the cash by the end of the month.
Describes giving a specific amount of money to someone else.
She handed over a sum of $20,000 per child to the trustee.
Explains an arrangement made without formal paperwork.
Their deal was based on verbal trust during the marriage rather than a written contract.
Expresses that a legal outcome is very challenging to achieve.
Oral promises are notoriously difficult to enforce in court.
Describes financial dishonesty or fraud.
The tribunal found that he intentionally misappropriated the capital for personal gain.
💬Discussion Questions
Open-ended questions to talk or write about — alone, with a partner, or in class.
- 1
What steps should families take to protect financial gifts given to children?
Opinion
News sourced from: MarketWatch →. LectoPress rewrites the facts as original graded-reader text for language learners.
Get stories at your level, every day
B2 · EN · delivered to your inbox · unsubscribe any time
Customize language, level & topics → full preferences
