White House Backs Hegseth as New Details Come Out About Iran War's Cost

The White House is standing firmly behind Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth as he faces impeachment efforts from a Republican representative. This political battle comes as new reports reveal the immense financial cost of the war with Iran, which reached over thirty-three billion dollars by mid-June, with ongoing costs of two billion dollars per month. Meanwhile, diplomatic relations remain tense. Iran has rejected recent American communication, refusing any negotiations until its conditions are met, while China has pledged to protect Iran's economic interests against American sanctions.
The White House has officially declared its support for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who is currently facing an impeachment attempt in Congress. After Kentucky Republican Representative Thomas Massie introduced articles of impeachment against the Pentagon chief, Attorney General Todd Blanche defended him publicly, stating that Hegseth was doing an excellent job.
Meanwhile, new financial data has revealed the massive economic burden of the conflict. The military's inspector general estimated that the war had already cost the United States $33.4 billion by mid-June. Furthermore, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office warned that the government could spend an additional $2 billion every month for the duration of the hostilities.
On the diplomatic front, a senior Iranian official recently dismissed President Trump's contradictory statements regarding potential peace negotiations. The official declared that the situation was now completely different, insisting that no diplomatic talks would occur until Iran's specific conditions were met.
At the same time, Beijing has signaled its continued backing of Tehran. During a meeting in the Chinese capital, Foreign Minister Wang Yi told his Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araghchi, that China was prepared to protect Iran's legitimate rights and interests. Wang also urged both the United States and Iran to remain rational. This diplomatic support suggests that China will not cooperate with American efforts to isolate Iran economically. Last year, Chinese purchases of Iranian crude oil funded nearly 45 percent of Iran's national budget, providing a vital lifeline despite Washington's strict financial sanctions.
Take a position. Out loud, if you can.
Four ways to start. Pick one and try saying it before you scroll on.
Tip · Record yourself, use in a notebook, or practice with a language partner.
How much did the war cost the United States up to mid-June according to the military's inspector general?
Passive Voice in Subordinate Clauses
The passive voice is used when the focus is on the action or the receiver of the action, rather than the agent performing the action. In the subordinate clause 'until Iran's specific conditions were met', the agent (the United States) is omitted to focus entirely on the conditions being satisfied.
“The official declared that the situation was now completely different, insisting that no diplomatic talks would occur until Iran's specific conditions were met.”
What to know · B2
Try saying this aloud
Scenario: You are discussing a complex group project at work or school where one party is refusing to cooperate until certain requirements are satisfied.
- 01“insisting that no diplomatic talks would occur”
- 02“until specific conditions were met”
- 03“massive economic burden”
Register tip · informal
🔑Key Phrases
Used to describe a public official who is undergoing a formal process that could remove them from office due to misconduct.
The mayor is currently facing an impeachment attempt after the financial scandal.
Describes a very large financial cost or weight that is difficult to bear.
The ongoing repairs placed a massive economic burden on the local community.
Used to describe situations where someone says things that conflict with each other regarding future possibilities.
The company issued contradictory statements regarding potential layoffs.
Refers to safeguarding the lawful and justified interests of a nation.
The treaty was designed to protect the nation's legitimate rights to trade.
Economic penalties imposed by one country on another to restrict financial transactions.
The government faced strict financial sanctions after violating the international treaty.
Article Audio — Kokoro TTS
White House Backs Hegseth as New Details Come Out About Iran War's Cost
💬Discussion Questions
Open-ended questions to talk or write about — alone, with a partner, or in class.
- 1
How do economic relationships with countries like China affect the global impact of unilateral financial sanctions?
Evaluate
News sourced from: CBS News →. LectoPress rewrites the facts as original graded-reader text for language learners.
Get stories at your level, every day
B2 · EN · delivered to your inbox · unsubscribe any time
Customize language, level & topics → full preferences


