Meta Negotiates Agreement With Zuckerberg Over Potential Wealth Tax
Meta and Mark Zuckerberg have finalized an agreement to ensure the CEO remains a California resident despite upcoming tax legislation. Proposition 40, if passed, would create a significant one-time wealth tax for billionaires. To help Zuckerberg cover potential costs without losing his voting control, Meta will issue him special non-voting shares. In exchange, Zuckerberg has promised to stay in the state for eight years. This arrangement allows the company to navigate potential tax liabilities while protecting its leadership structure during a period of legislative uncertainty.
Meta has reached a strategic agreement with Mark Zuckerberg that allows the CEO to maintain his residency in California. This decision follows discussions regarding the potential implementation of a new state wealth tax. If Proposition 40 is approved by voters this November, it would impose a significant one-time levy of five percent on the total net worth of billionaires who were residents on January 1, 2026. Zuckerberg, who currently holds a massive fortune, had previously expressed concerns about the financial impact of this regulation, even suggesting that he might relocate his primary home to avoid it.
To address this situation, Meta has committed to issuing a specialized type of equity, specifically non-voting common shares, starting in January 2027. Under the terms of the deal, Zuckerberg will receive these shares, which he can liquidate to settle any tax obligations without sacrificing his voting power within the corporation. He has pledged to remain a resident of California, or the state where the company keeps its headquarters, for the next eight years. By selling a portion of this new stock, he can cover the potential liability while keeping control over company decisions.
Financial experts note that this arrangement serves to protect both the executive and the business interests of the organization. If the tax passes, payments would be due in 2027, although the state might allow these costs to be spread over five years with additional fees. Assets such as retirement accounts and real estate are generally excluded from this calculation. Nevertheless, for an individual with a net worth approaching two hundred and fifty billion dollars, the financial implications remain substantial. Meta officials emphasized that these shares were designed to attract talent and support acquisitions, yet they now also function as a safeguard against the shifting legislative landscape in California.
Take a position. Out loud, if you can.
Four ways to start. Pick one and try saying it before you scroll on.
Tip · Record yourself, use in a notebook, or practice with a language partner.
What is the primary reason for the agreement between Meta and Zuckerberg?
Second Conditional
The second conditional is used to talk about hypothetical or unlikely situations in the present or future, using 'if' + past simple, and 'would' + verb.
“If Proposition 40 is approved by voters this November, it would impose a significant one-time levy of five percent on the total net worth of billionaires who were residents on January 1, 2026.”
What to know · B2
Try saying this aloud
Scenario: Discussing business news with a colleague
- 01“It is a strategic move.”
- 02“The implications remain substantial.”
- 03“They are navigating uncertainty.”
Register tip · informal
🔑Key Phrases
This phrase describes a future policy that is not yet certain.
The potential implementation of the new law caused confusion.
Important for corporate control contexts.
She made the change without sacrificing her authority.
A common way to describe how laws change over time.
Companies struggle in a shifting legislative landscape.
A formal way to talk about paying debts.
The insurance will cover the potential liability.
💬Discussion Questions
Open-ended questions to talk or write about — alone, with a partner, or in class.
- 1
Do you think it is fair for companies to create special share classes to help CEOs pay personal taxes?
Opinion - 2
How might a wealth tax affect the decisions of wealthy individuals living in a specific state?
Evaluate
News sourced from: Fox Business →. LectoPress rewrites the facts as original graded-reader text for language learners.
Get stories at your level, every day
B2 · EN · delivered to your inbox · unsubscribe any time
Customize language, level & topics → full preferences
